000 03230nam a22003855i 4500
001 99900
003 DE-He213
005 20230110040155.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 180117s2018 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783319693361
_9
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-319-69336-1
_2doi
040 _aES-MaUEC
_bspa
050 4 _aD250
_b.D447 2018 EB
100 1 _aDeer Richardson, Linda
_eautor
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 1 0 _aAcademic Theories of Generation in the Renaissance:
_bThe Contemporaries and Successors of Jean Fernel (1497-1558)
_cby Linda Deer Richardson, Benjamin Goldberg.
264 1 _aCham, Switzerland
_bSpringer International Publishing
_c2018
300 _a1 recurso en línea (XXXI, 301 páginas 11 ilustraciones)
336 _2rdacontent
_aTexto
_btxt
337 _2rdamedia
_aelectrónico
_bc
338 _2rdacarrier
_arecurso electrónico
_bcr
347 _atext file
_bPDF
490 0 _aHistory, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences,
_x2211-1948 ;
_v22
520 3 _aThis volume deals with philosophically grounded theories of animal generation as found in two different traditions: one, deriving primarily from Aristotelian natural philosophy and specifically from his Generation of Animals; and another, deriving from two related medical traditions, the Hippocratic and the Galenic. The book contains a classification and critique of works that touch on the history of embryology and animal generation written before 1980. It also contains translations of key sections of the works on which it is focused. It looks at two different scholarly communities: the physicians (medici) and philosophers (philosophi), that share a set of textual resources and philosophical lineages, as well as a shared problem (explaining animal generation), but that nevertheless have different concerns and commitments. The book demonstrates how those working in these two traditions not only shared a common philosophical background in the arts curricula of the universities, but were in constant intercourse with each other. This book presents a test case of how scholarly communities differentiate themselves from each other through methods of argument, empirical investigation, and textual interpretations. It is all the more interesting because the two communities under investigation have so much in common and yet, in the end, are distinct in a number of important ways.
650 7 _aHistoria moderna
_yS.XVII
_2embne
_9667058
700 1 _aGoldberg, Benjamin
_eautor
_0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no00081009
_0http://viaf.org/viaf/66422057
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
_0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2005046756
_0http://viaf.org/viaf/148105729
_9106996
776 0 8 _iEdición impresa:
_z9783319693347
776 0 8 _iEdición impresa:
_z9783319693354
776 0 8 _iEdición impresa:
_z9783319887579
856 4 0 _uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69336-1
_zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid)
490 0 _aMedicine (Springer-11650)
988 _aSpringer_Medicine_2018
998 _b01/2019
_dz
_ek
_feng
_ggw
_h0
999 _c99900
_d99900
_x1