000			02840cam a2200373Ii 4500
999			_c96622 _d96622 _x1
001			96622
003			ES-MaUEC
005			20230102112803.0
006			m o d
007			cr cnu|||unuuu
008			171020s2017 gw ob 000 0 eng d
020			_a3658199156 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_a9783658199159 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_z3658199148
020			_z9783658199142
040			_aN$T _beng _epn _cN$T _dN$T _dYDX _dGW5XE _dOCLCF _dUAB _dDKU _dUPM _dIOG _dJG0 _dCOO _dES-MaUEC _bspa
050		4	_aP301.5.A27 _b2017 EB
100	1		_aStarck, J. Matthias, _eautor
245	1	0	_aScientific peer review : _bguidelines for informative peer review _cJ. Matthias Starck
264		1	_aWiesbaden, Germany _bSpringer International Publishing Spektrum _c2017
300			_a1 recurso en línea
336			_aTexto _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aelectrónico _bc _2rdamedia
338			_arecurso electrónico _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF
490	0		_aEssentials
520	3		_aJ. Matthias Starck comprehensively guides the reader in this essential through all steps of writing an expert review for a scientific journal. It is built on a succinct analysis how science works, how science is communicated and how science is published. It provides a critical guide how to write good, informative and fair peer reviews. The author presents a critical discussion of different peer review procedures and their alternatives, explains ethical guidelines as well as the dark sides of scientific publishing. So this essential helps the reader to perform better in the existing system and to contribute to its further development and improvement. Contents Essence of Scientific Communication Why Peer Review? Responsibilities of the Reviewer and Ethical Rules in the Reviewing Process Critique and Variations of the Journal Peer Reviewing Process Reviewer Recognition Institutions and Committees/Recommendations in Conflict Target Groups Advanced PhD students and postdocs from biomedical research and natural science fields who received their first peer review requests and now seek advice and guidance Researchers from all fields of science and all degrees of experience who wish to improve and develop their methodological approach to peer review The Author Prof. Dr. J. Matthias Starck is Professor of Zoology, Department Biology II, at the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich.
588	0		_aOnline resource; title from PDF title page (EBSCO, viewed October 25, 2017).
988			_aEBOOK, EBSPRINGER_2017
650		7	_aEscritos académicos _2embne _9667849
856	4	0	_uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-658-19915-9 _zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid)
942			_2lcc _cLE
998			_b02/2018 _dz _e- _zSI