| 000 | 05301cam a2200433Ii 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 95794 | ||
| 003 | ES-MaUEC | ||
| 005 | 20230102112722.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr cnu|||unuuu | ||
| 008 | 170411s2017 si ob 000 0 eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9789811037344 _q(electronic bk.) |
||
| 020 |
_a9811037345 _q(electronic bk.) |
||
| 020 | _z9789811037337 | ||
| 020 | _z9811037337 | ||
| 040 |
_aN$T _cN$T _dN$T _dGW5XE _dEBLCP _dOCLCF _dYDX _dUAB _dESU _dAZU _dUPM _dOCLCA _dVT2 _dOTZ _dOCLCQ _dIOG _dU3W _dES-MaUEC _bspa |
||
| 050 | 4 |
_aTK7882.S65 _bH568 2017 EB |
|
| 100 | 1 | _aHinterleitner, Florian. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aQuality of synthetic speech : _bperceptual dimensions, influencing factors, and instrumental assessment _cFlorian Hinterleitner. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aSingapore _bSpringer _c[2017] |
|
| 300 | _a1 recurso en línea | ||
| 336 |
_aTexto _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_aelectrónico _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_arecurso electrónico _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 490 | 0 | _aT-labs series in telecommunication services | |
| 500 |
_aSpringerLink _bSpringer Engineering eBooks 2017 English+International |
||
| 504 | _aIncluye referencias bibliográficas | ||
| 505 | 0 | _aAcknowledgements; Contents; Acronyms; Abstract; 1 Introduction; 1.1 Motivation; 1.2 Outline; References; 2 Speech Synthesis; 2.1 Setup of a Speech Synthesizer; 2.1.1 Natural Language Processing (NLP); 2.1.2 Prosody Generation; 2.1.3 Concatenation and Generation of Speech-Signal Parameters; 2.1.4 Speech Signal Generation; 2.2 The Mary Text-to-Speech System (MaryTTS); References; 3 Auditory and Instrumental Quality Evaluation Metrics; 3.1 What Is Perceptual Quality?; 3.2 Taxonomy for the Quality Assessment of Synthetic Speech; 3.2.1 Glass Box Versus Black Box. | |
| 505 | 8 | _a3.2.2 Laboratory Versus Field Studies3.2.3 Linguistic Versus Acoustic; 3.2.4 Auditory Versus Instrumental; 3.3 Auditory Quality Evaluation Metrics; 3.3.1 Functional TestsThe content of this section has previously been published in a slightly different version in [6].; 3.3.2 Judgment TestsParts of the content of this section have previously been published in a slightly different version in [13] and [6].; 3.4 Instrumental Quality Evaluation Metrics; 3.4.1 Reference-Based MeasuresParts of the content of this section have previously been published in a slightly different version in [21]. | |
| 505 | 8 | _a3.4.2 Reference-Free MeasuresReferences; 4 Perceptual Quality Dimensions; 4.1 State-of-the-Art Perceptual Quality DimensionsParts of the content of this section have previously been published in a slightly different version in [1].; 4.1.1 Study: Kraft and Portele (Kraft1995); 4.1.2 Study: Mayo et al. I (Mayo2005); 4.1.3 Study: Viswanathan and Viswanathan (Vis2005); 4.1.4 Study: Seget (Seget2007); 4.1.5 Study: Hinterleitner (Hint2010); 4.1.6 Study: Mayo et al. II (Mayo2011); 4.1.7 Restrictions of Discussed Studies. | |
| 505 | 8 | _a4.2 Semantic Differential and Factor AnalysisParts of the content of this section have previously been published in a slightly different version in [13].4.2.1 Experimental Setup; 4.2.2 Statistical Analysis; 4.3 Sorting Task and Multidimensional ScalingParts of the content of this section have previously been published in a slightly different version in [16].; 4.3.1 Experimental Setup; 4.3.2 Statistical Analysis; 4.4 Summary of the SD/FA and ST/MDS StudiesParts of the content of this section have previously been published in a slightly different version in [16]. | |
| 505 | 8 | _a4.5 4.5 Universal Perceptual Quality Dimensions4.5.1 Naturalness of Voice; 4.5.2 Prosodic Quality; 4.5.3 Fluency and Intelligibility; 4.5.4 Absence of Disturbances; 4.5.5 Calmness; 4.5.6 Instructions for TTS Quality Assessment; 4.6 Summary; References; 5 Influencing Factors on Perceptual Quality; 5.1 Influence of the ApplicationParts of the content of this section have previously been published in a slightly different version in [1].; 5.1.1 Pretest; 5.1.2 Main TestThe content of this section has previously been published in a slightly different version in [10].; 5.1.3 Conclusions. | |
| 520 | 3 | _aThis book reviews research towards perceptual quality dimensions of synthetic speech, compares these findings with the state of the art, and derives a set of five universal perceptual quality dimensions for TTS signals. They are: (i) naturalness of voice, (ii) prosodic quality, (iii) fluency and intelligibility, (iv) absence of disturbances, and (v) calmness. Moreover, a test protocol for the efficient indentification of those dimensions in a listening test is introduced. Furthermore, several factors influencing these dimensions are examined. In addition, different techniques for the instrumental quality assessment of TTS signals are introduced, reviewed and tested. Finally, the requirements for the integration of an instrumental quality measure into a concatenative TTS system are examined. | |
| 650 | 7 |
_aReconocimiento automático del lenguaje _2embne _0(OCoLC)fst01129243 _0 _9147323 |
|
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-10-3734-4 _zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid) |
| 988 | _aEBOOK, asignarmaterias, EBSPRINGER_2017C | ||
| 998 |
_b02/2018 _dz _e- _zSI |
||
| 999 |
_c95794 _d95794 _x1 |
||