000 03545nam a22004575i 4500
001 86845
003 ES-MaUEC
005 20230207040617.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 160524s2016 si | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9789811009112
040 _aES-MaUEC
050 4 _aQH77.I4
_bR433 2016 EB
082 0 4 _a577
100 1 _aReddy, G. Vishwanatha.
_9100875
_0Local
245 1 0 _aRecovering Biodiversity in Indian Forests
_cby G Vishwanatha Reddy, K Ullas Karanth, N Samba Kumar, Jagdish Krishnaswamy, Krithi K Karanth
260 _aSingapore
_bSpringer
_c2016
300 _a1 recurso en línea (XI, 111 p.) 37 il., 9 il. col.
336 _aTexto (visual)
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _aelectrónico
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _arecurso electrónico
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _aSpringerBriefs in Ecology
_x2192-4759
505 0 _aChapter 1 Role Of Wildlife Protected Areas In India -- Chapter 2 Study Species, Habitats And Hypotheses -- Chapter 3 Survey Design, Field and Analytical Methods -- Chapter 4 Results and Findings -- Chapter 5 Synthesis, Discussion and Conclusions.
520 _aThis book demonstrates how varying levels of human disturbance manifested through different management regimes influence composition, richness, diversity and abundance of key mammal, bird and plant species, even within ecologically similar habitats. Based on our results, we show the critical importance of the �wildlife preservation� approach for effective biodiversity conservation. The study also provides examples of a practical application of rigorous methods of quantitative sampling of different plant and animal taxa as well as human influences, thus serving as a useful manual for protected area managers. Protected areas of various kinds have been established in India with the goal of arresting decline in, and to provide for, recovery of biodiversity and ecosystem services. A model that targets �wildlife preservation� under state ownership is practiced across the country. However, forests in India are under intensive human pressure and varying levels of protection; therefore, protected areas may also experience open-access resource use, a model that is being aggressively advocated as a viable alternative to �preservationism�. We have evaluated the conservation efficacy of alternative forest management models by quantifying levels of biodiversity under varied levels of access, resource extraction and degree of state-sponsored protection in the Nagarahole forest landscape of southwestern India.
942 _2lcc
_cLE
988 0 0 _aEBOOK, EBSPRINGER
650 0 4 _9495993
_aCiencias de la vida
650 7 _aEcología animal
_0comprobar BNE19900983482
_2embne
_9140307
650 0 7 _aEcología
_0LocalX
_2embne
_9404984
700 1 _aKaranth, K. Ullas
_0Local
_9100876
700 1 _aKumar, N. Samba
_0Local
_9100877
700 1 _aKrishnaswamy, Jagdish
_0Local
_9100878
700 1 _aKaranth, Krithi K.
_9100879
_0Local
830 0 _aSpringerBriefs in Ecology
_x2192-4759
_9133238
856 4 0 _uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-10-0911-2
_zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid)
901 _ai9789811009112
907 _a.b12961231
_b10-10-17
_c21-11-16
998 _am
_a_alco
_a_vill
_b - -
_cm
_dz
_e-
_feng
_gsi
_h0
945 _aQH77.I4 R433 2016 EB
_g1
_ieBOOK
_j0
_lmae
_o-
_pEUR0.00
_q-
_r-
_sb
_t15
_u0
_v0
_w0
_x0
_y.i11602053
_z06-04-17
999 _c86845
_d86845
_x1