000			03468nam a22003135i 4500
001			403183
003			ES-MaUEC
005			20240603113732.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			230713s2023 sz | o |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783031298899
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-031-29889-9 _2doi
040			_aES-MaUEC _bspa _cES-MaUEC _dES-MaUEC
050		4	_aBF173-175.5 _b2023 EB
100	1		_aTal, Mohamed. _eauthor. _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245	1	4	_aThe End of Analysis : _bThe Dialectics of Symbolic and Real _cby Mohamed Tal
250			_a1st ed. 2023
264		1	_aCham _bSpringer International Publishing _c2023
300			_a1 recurso en línea
336			_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aelectrónico _bc _2rdamedia
338			_arecurso electrónico _bcr _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aThe Palgrave Lacan Series _x2946-420X
505	0		_a1. Introduction: I Don't Want to Save Love, nor Do I Want to Get Rid of It -- 2. A Reading of "Analysis Terminable and Interminable" -- 3. The "Rescuing" of Castration -- 4. The Procedure, from Solution to Dissolution.
520			_a"Tal's book doesn't propose an answer that would safeguard the status of psychoanalysis but rather a series of paradoxes that undermine its secure status. The end of analysis appears rather as a fantasy, not the traversal of the fantasy but the maintaining of it." -From the Foreword by Professor Mladen Dolar, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia This book interrogates the "end of analysis" in psychoanalytic thought from Freud to Lacan. It demonstrates that the notions of mourning, renunciation, liquidation of transference, and traversal of fantasy cannot serve as a settlement for the castration complex (i.e., central to neurosis) but are rather prey to the castration complex itself. It shows how psychoanalysis remains incomplete as long as it has not surpassed them as fantasies sustained by psychoanalytic ideology. In other words, it argues that the analytic procedure must pull psychoanalysis out of this therapeutic tradition for it to be complete and to instigate an attempt of its renewal. The book equally revisits Freud's and Lacan's underpinnings in the Enlightenment project, in order to formulate the problem of transference on proper dialectical foundations-that is, the mechanism of alienation from Descartes to Hegel, Kierkegaard's concept of anxiety, as well as the concepts of authority and value in Durkheim, Mauss, and Marx. In doing so, it provides fresh insights that will appeal to practitioners, as well as to scholars of psychoanalysis and philosophy. Mohamed Tal is a Clinical Psychologist and Psychoanalyst; he held a private practice in Beirut, Lebanon, since 2009 and moved to practice in Dubai, UAE, since 2022. He is an affiliate of the Rome Institute, and a member of the Beirut Institute for Critical Analysis and Research (BICAR). Dr Tal has worked as a Psychotherapist with humanitarian organizations in the Middle East, including Doctors Without Borders, WarChild Holland, Handicap International, and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit. He also held a seminar on The Real at the École Libanaise de Psychanalyse from 2018 to 2021. .
856	4	0	_uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29889-9 _zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid)
942			_2lcc _cLE
988			_aSpringer_Psychology_2023
999			_c403183 _d403183