000			02769nam a22003015i 4500
001			403101
003			ES-MaUEC
005			20240603113724.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			230411s2023 sz | o |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783031290428
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-031-29042-8 _2doi
040			_aES-MaUEC _bspa _cES-MaUEC _dES-MaUEC
050		4	_aBF1-990 _b2023 EB
100	1		_aEvans, Megan. _eauthor. _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245	1	0	_aPeer Support Services Reaching People with Schizophrenia : _bConsiderations for Research and Practice _cby Megan Evans
250			_a1st ed. 2023
264		1	_aCham _bSpringer International Publishing _c2023
300			_a1 recurso en línea
336			_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aelectrónico _bc _2rdamedia
338			_arecurso electrónico _bcr _2rdacarrier
505	0		_aChapter 1. Schizophrenia as a Public Health Problem -- Chapter 2: Current Approaches to Schizophrenia Treatment. Chapter 3 -- Theoretical foundations of peer support -- Chapter 4. Origins of peer support and the modern recovery movement in the United States -- Chapter 5. Peer support and mental health-a review of the evidence. Chapter 6: Realist perspective and methodology -- Chapter 7. Diversity in programmatic features, peer support strategies, potential mechanisms, and outcomes -- Chapter 8. Implementation considerations and key challenges -- Chapter 9. Summary, implications, and future directions.
520			_aMany mental health providers are seeking guidance in designing and improving peer support programs for people with mental illnesses. However, the evidence base in this area is limited by lack of consensus on the core components of peer support. This research provides a comprehensive, nuanced view of peer support reaching people with schizophrenia. Results of a realist review of 355 sources and interviews with experts in the field are presented. Realist review is an approach to evidence synthesis that asks, 'What works, for whom, and in what circumstances?' Results include a typology of key functions of peer support (e.g., being there, linkage to clinical care and community resources, systems advocacy, ongoing support), documented benefits (e.g., decreased acute care utilization, increased recovery), and implementation recommendations (e.g., critical mass of peer workers, supportive infrastructure, an organizational recovery orientation). The book is intended for program planners, managers, and researchers.
856	4	0	_uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29042-8 _zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid)
942			_2lcc _cLE
988			_aSpringer_Psychology_2023
999			_c403101 _d403101