000			03476nam a2200337 i 4500
999			_c402236 _d402236
001			402236
003			ES-MaUEC
005			20240611114257.0
006			a||||fo|||| 00| 0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			230426s2023 sz | fo |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783031303715
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-031-30371-5 _2doi
040			_aES-MaUEC _bspa _cES-MaUEC _dES-MaUEC
050		4	_aR723 _b2023 EB
100	1		_aVelanovich, Vic _eautor _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut _9690432
245	1	0	_aMedical Persuasion : _bUnderstanding the Impact on Medical Argumentation _cby Vic Velanovich
250			_a1st ed. 2023
264		1	_aCham _bSpringer International Publishing _c2023
300			_a1 recurso en línea
336			_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aelectrónico _bc _2rdamedia
338			_arecurso electrónico _bcr _2rdacarrier
505	0		_aIntroduction -- Rationality, Reasoning and Logic -- The Human Mind -- Persuasiveness of Arguments -- Causation Attribution -- Acceptance of New Knowledge Through Medical Research -- Application of Medical Knowledge to Patient Care -- Correlations with "Non-Western" Medical Theory and Practice: Traditional Chinese Medicine, Traditional Indigenous Medicine, Faith Healing, and Homeopathy -- Future of Medical Decision Making.
520			_aThis unique book is a major contribution to the literature on persuasion in communication, and on doctor-patient communication, in particular. Written by a physician-scientist with deep experience on the topic, the book offers a comprehensive analysis of what makes an argument in medicine persuasive, outlining the characteristics of an argument that causes people to accept that the conclusion(s) of an argument are true. Although the book focuses on medical arguments in particular, the general approach offered by the author is appropriate for any informal argument. The central emphasis is that although sound logical construction and true premises are required to establish the logical truth of a conclusion, this is insufficient for persuasion to occur. Although formal logic can exist independent of human reception, real-world arguments must have both an arguer (the individual constructing the argument) and an audience (individuals listening and evaluating the argument).Whether the audience is capable of changing their world view is as important as the logical construction of the argument, maintains the author. To illustrate all points, a plethora of examples in medical research and in diagnosis and treatment decisions are presented. Medical Persuasion: Understanding the Impact on Medical Argumentation is a unique contribution to the clinical literature and will be of immense interest to medical practitioners, researchers, and philosophers as a way of gaining insights into constructing arguments for their peers and patients. In addition, medical trainees will gain important insights in the production of medical knowledge and medical practices, and even students in the social sciences and humanities will find the work valuable as a conduit to gaining insight into the reception of an argument. .
988			_aSpringer_Medicine_2023
650		7	_2embne _9164436 _aLógica médica
856	4	0	_uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30371-5 _zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid)
942			_2lcc _cLE
998			_b06/2024 _dz _eb _zSI