000 05312nam a2200349 i 4500
999 _c398895
_d398895
001 398895
003 ES-MaUEC
005 20240316102345.0
006 a|||| o|||| 00| 0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 230518s2023 sz | o |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783031298790
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-031-29879-0
_2doi
040 _aES-MaUEC
_bspa
_cES-MaUEC
_dES-MaUEC
050 4 _aQH371.3 .M37
_b2023 EB
100 1 _aWallace, Rodrick
_eautor
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_999775
245 1 0 _aEssays on the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis :
_bFormalizations and Expansions
_cby Rodrick Wallace
250 _a1st ed. 2023
264 1 _aCham
_bSpringer Nature Switzerland
_c2023
300 _a1 recurso en línea
336 _atexto
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _aelectrónico
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _arecurso electrónico
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
490 0 _aSpringerBriefs in Evolutionary Biology
_x2192-8142
505 0 _a1 On the majortransitions -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.2 Symmetry and symmetry-breaking -- 1.3 Resources -- 1.4 Cognition in non ergodic systems -- 1.5 Theprebiotic`bigbang' -- 1.6 Biological`recombination transparency' -- 1.7 A simple application -- 1.8 Specialization and cooperation: multiple workspaces -- 1.9 Discussion -- 1.10 Mathematical Appendix -- 1.11 References -- 2 On the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 First notions -- 2.3 The basic theory -- 2.4 Examples -- 2.5 More theory:selection pressureas shadowprice -- 2.6 Extending the models -- 2.7 Discussion -- 2.8 Mathematical Appendix -- 2.9 References -- 3O On regulation -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Theory -- 3.3 Applications -- 3.4 Discussion -- 3.5 Mathematical Appendix -- 3.6 References -- 4 Punctuated regulation as an evolutionary mechanism -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Fisher Zeros reconsidered -- 4.3 Extinction I:Simple noise-induced transitions -- 4.4 Extinction II: More complicatednoise-induced transitions -- 4.5 Extinction III: Environmental shadow price -- 4.6 Discussion -- 4.7 Mathematical Appendix -- 4.8 References -- 5 Institutional dynamics under selection pressure and uncertainty -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 A Rate Distortion Theorem model of control -- 5.3 Selection pressure dynamics -- 5.4 Destabilization by delay -- 5.5 Extending the Data Rate Theorem -- 5.6 Moving on -- 5.7 Reconsideringcognition\textit{AnSich -- 5.8 Changingtheviewpoint -- 5.9 Discussion -- 5. References -- 6O n`Speciation':Fragmentsizeininformationsystemphasetransitions -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2`Simple'phasetransition -- 6.3 Phasetransitionsinnetworksofinformation-exchangemodules -- 6.4 Discussion -- 6.5 MathematicalAppendix:`Biological'renormalizations -- 6.6 References -- 7 Adaptingcognitionmodelstobiomolecularcondensatedynamics -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 Resources -- 7.3 Cognition -- 7.4 PhasetransitionsI:Fisherzeros -- 7.5 Cognitive`reactionrate' -- 7.6 PhasetransitionsII:Signaltransductionandnoise -- 7.7 Discussion -- 7.8 MathematicalAppendix:Groupoids -- 7.9 References -- 8 EvolutionaryExaptation:Sharedinterbrainactivityinsocialcommunication -- 8.1 Introduction -- 8.2 Correlation -- 8.3 Cognition -- 8.4 Dynamics -- 8.5 Cognitionrate -- 8.6 Anexample -- 8.7 Cooperation:Multipleworkspaces -- 8.8 Networktopologyisimportant -- 8.9 Timeandresourceconstraintsareimportant -- 8.10 Furthertheoreticaldevelopment -- 8.11 Discussion -- 8.12 MathematicalAppendix -- 8.13 References -- 9 Afterward.
520 _aFrom the 'punctuated equilibrium' of Eldrege and Gould, through Lewontin's 'triple helix' and the various visions and revisions of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) of Laland and others, both data and theory have demanded an opening-up of the 1950's Evolutionary Synthesis that so firmly wedded evolutionary theory to the mathematics of gene frequency analysis. It can, however, be argued that a single deep and comprehensive mathematical theory may simply not be possible for the almost infinite varieties of evolutionary process active at and across the full range of scales of biological, social, institutional, and cultural phenomena. Indeed, the case history of 'meme theory' should have raised a red flag that narrow gene-centered models of evolutionary process may indeed have serious limitations. What is attempted here is less grand, but still broader than a gene-centered analysis. Following the instruction of Maturana and Varela that all living systems are cognitive, in a certain sense, and that living as a process is a process of cognition, the asymptotic limit theorems of information and control theories that bound all cognition provide a basis for constructing an only modestly deep but wider-ranging series of probability models that might be converted into useful statistical tools for the analysis of observational and experimental data related to evolutionary process. The line of argument in this series of interrelated essays proves to be surprisingly direct.
988 _aSpringer_BiomedLife_2023
650 7 _2embne
_9138470
_aEvolución
_xModelos matemáticos
856 4 0 _uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29879-0
_zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid)
942 _2lcc
_cLE
998 _b03/2024
_dz
_eb
_zSI