000			03776nam a22003855i 4500
999			_c397703 _d397703 _x1
001			397703
003			ES-MaUEC
005			20240314174429.0
006			a||||fo|||| 00| 0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			231016s2024 sz | o |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783031441592
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-031-44159-2 _2doi
040			_aES-MaUEC _bspa _cES-MaUEC _dES-MaUEC
050		4	_aQ335 _b2024 EB
100	1		_aClocksin, W. F. _eautor _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut _9689365 _d1955- _q(William F.),
245	1	0	_aComputational Modelling of Robot Personhood and Relationality _cby William F Clocksin
250			_afirst edition 2024
264		1	_aCham _c2024 _bSpringer International Publishing
300			_a1 recurso en línea
336			_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aelectrónico _bc _2rdamedia
338			_arecurso electrónico _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF
490	0		_aSpringerBriefs in Computer Science _x2191-5776
505	0		_aPart 1: Androids: Persons and Relationships -- Introduction -- Significant Concerns -- Personhood and Relationality -- Part 2: The Affinity System -- The Computational Model -- Modelling Concerns -- The Economy -- Narratives -- Analysis of Value Systems -- Conclusion.
520			_aThis SpringerBrief is a computational study of significant concerns and their role in forming long-term relationships between intelligent entities. Significant concerns include attitudes, preferences, affinities, and values that are held to be highly valued and meaningful: The means through which a person may find deeply held identity, purpose, and transformation. Significant concerns always engage the emotions and senses in a way that simply holding an opinion may or may not. For example, experiencing a significant concern may provoke deep feelings of awe and wonder in a way that deciding what to have for lunch probably does not, even if the lunch decision involves a rich array of preferences and values. Significant concerns also include what Emmons has called ultimate concerns. The author builds upon this base by considering the hypothetical case of intelligence in androids. An android is defined as a human-like robot that humans would accept as equal to humans in how they perform and behave in society. An android as defined in this book is not considered to be imitating a human, nor is its purpose to deceive humans into believing that it is a human. Instead, the appropriately programmed android self-identifies as a non-human with its own integrity as a person. Therefore, a computational understanding of personhood and how persons - whether human or android - participate in relationships is essential to this perspective on artificial intelligence. Computational Modelling of Robot Personhood and Relationality describes in technical detail an implementation of a computational model called Affinity that takes the form of a simulation of a population of entities that form, maintain, and break relationships with each other depending upon a rich range of values, motivations, attitudes, and beliefs. Future experimentation and improvements of this model may be used not only to gain a wider understanding of human persons but may also form a preliminary cognitive model of the reasoning process of an android.
988			_aSpringer_Computer_2024
650		7	_2embne _aInteligencia artificial _9413115
856	4	0	_uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44159-2 _zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid)
942			_2lcc _cLE
998			_b01/2024 _dz _ek _zSI