000			05689nam a2200433 i 4500
999			_c394984 _d394984
001			394984
003			ES-MaUEC
005			20230118130709.0
006			a||||fo|||| 00| 0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			221221s2022 sz o |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783031159473
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-031-15947-3 _2doi
040			_aES-MaUEC _bspa _cES-MaUEC _dES-MaUEC
050		4	_aRD594 _b2022 EB
245	0	0	_aDeath Determination by Neurologic Criteria : _bAreas of Consensus and Controversy _cedited by Ariane Lewis, James L. Bernat
250			_a1st edition 2022
264		1	_aCham _bSpringer International Publishing _c2022
300			_a1 recurso en línea (VII, 498 páginas)
336			_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aelectrónico _bc _2rdamedia
338			_arecurso electrónico _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_aarchivo de texto _bPDF
490	0		_aAdvances in Neuroethics _x2522-5685
505	0		_aIntroduction/History of Death Determination by Neurologic Criteria -- Part I: Philosophical/Conceptual -- Arguments Supporting Neurologic Criteria to Determine Death -- Arguments Rejecting Neurologic Criteria to Determine Death -- Arguments Supporting the Whole-Brain Criterion -- Arguments Supporting the Brain Stem Criterion -- Loss of Hypothalamic Function is Required to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Loss of Hypothalamic Function is not Required to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Part II: Medical -- Intra/International Variability in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Controversies in Determining Death by Neurological Criteria in Pediatric Patients -- Arguments in Favor of Requiring the Absence of Brain Circulation to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Arguments Opposing the Requirement to Demonstrate Absence of Blood Flow to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Reports of "Recovery" from Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Observation Time Prior to Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Temperature Considerations in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- How Many Evaluations are Required to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria? -- Part III: Scientific -- Research Questions about Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Research on Patients Declared Dead by Neurologic Criteria -- The Impact of Restoring Postmortem Mammalian Brain Circulation and Cellular Functions on the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Part IV: Legal -- The Content of Laws on Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Is Consent Required for Physicians' Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria? -- Legal Response to Religious and Other Objections to Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Death by Neurologic Criteria is a Legal Fiction -- Legal Considerations on the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria in the Pregnant Patient -- Part V: Religious -- Christian Perspectives on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Islamic Perspectives on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Jewish Perspectives on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Part VI: Ethical/Social -- Public Views on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Cultural Considerations in the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria in Asia -- Cultural Considerations in the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria in Africa -- The Argument for Personal Choice in Defining Death -- The distinction Between Death Declaration and Death Determination Using Neurologic -- Criteria -- Why Families Object to Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Arguments Favoring Continuation of Organ Support when Families Object to Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Arguments Opposing Continuation of Organ Support when Families Object to Declaration of Death by Neurological Criteria.
520			_aThis book presents principal controversies over the determination of death by neurologic criteria ("brain death"). The editors and authors are exceedingly well-versed in this subject and are on the forefront of the current debates. The content is divided in the following disciplinary: philosophical (conceptual), medical, scientific, legal, religious, and ethical/social. Many of the topics feature pro-con debates, allowing readers to consider the merits of the arguments and decide their own position. The work is targeted to clinicians and nurses who treat critically ill and dying patients, organ donation personnel, ethicists and philosophers who write on end-of-life issues, and lawyers and legislative/public policy professionals who draft laws on death determination. It identifies and debates the essential controversies currently raging in academic and public policy circles over the medical adequacy, scientific validity, and conceptual coherence of death determination by neurologic criteria. Whether a professional or a student, the reader will be given a comprehensive course in the most pressing controversies and areas of consensus in the determination of death by neurologic criteria.
988			_aSpringer_Medicine_2022
650		7	_2embne _9182487 _aCerebro _xHeridas y lesiones
650		7	_2embne _9138882 _aMuerte _xPruebas y certificación
650		7	_2embne _9139040 _aNeurología
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783031159466
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783031159480
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783031159497
856	4	0	_uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15947-3 _zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid)
942			_2lcc _cLE
998			_b01/2023 _dz _eb _zSI