000			03680nam a22003975i 4500
999			_c387449 _d387449
001			387449
003			ES-MaUEC
005			20230401115145.0
006			a||||fo|||| 00| 0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			230401s2011 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783031022760
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-031-02276-0 _2doi
040			_aES-MaUEC _bspa _cES-MaUEC _dES-MaUEC
050		4	_aZA3075 _b2011 EB
100	1		_aHarman, D. K. _eautor _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut _9687946 _q(Donna K.)
245	1	0	_aInformation Retrieval Evaluation _cby Donna Harman
250			_a1st edition 2011
264		1	_aCham _bSpringer International Publishing _c2011
300			_a1 recurso en línea (XI, 107 páginas)
336			_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aelectrónico _bc _2rdamedia
338			_arecurso electrónico _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_aarchivo de texto _bPDF
490	0		_aSynthesis Lectures on Information Concepts Retrieval and Services _x1947-9468
505	0		_aIntroduction and Early History -- "Batch" Evaluation Since 1992 -- Interactive Evaluation -- Conclusion.
520			_aEvaluation has always played a major role in information retrieval, with the early pioneers such as Cyril Cleverdon and Gerard Salton laying the foundations for most of the evaluation methodologies in use today. The retrieval community has been extremely fortunate to have such a well-grounded evaluation paradigm during a period when most of the human language technologies were just developing. This lecture has the goal of explaining where these evaluation methodologies came from and how they have continued to adapt to the vastly changed environment in the search engine world today. The lecture starts with a discussion of the early evaluation of information retrieval systems, starting with the Cranfield testing in the early 1960s, continuing with the Lancaster "user" study for MEDLARS, and presenting the various test collection investigations by the SMART project and by groups in Britain. The emphasis in this chapter is on the how and the why of the various methodologies developed. The second chapter covers the more recent "batch" evaluations, examining the methodologies used in the various open evaluation campaigns such as TREC, NTCIR (emphasis on Asian languages), CLEF (emphasis on European languages), INEX (emphasis on semi-structured data), etc. Here again the focus is on the how and why, and in particular on the evolving of the older evaluation methodologies to handle new information access techniques. This includes how the test collection techniques were modified and how the metrics were changed to better reflect operational environments. The final chapters look at evaluation issues in user studies -- the interactive part of information retrieval, including a look at the search log studies mainly done by the commercial search engines. Here the goal is to show, via case studies, how the high-level issues of experimental design affect the final evaluations. Table of Contents: Introduction and Early History / "Batch" Evaluation Since 1992 / Interactive Evaluation / Conclusion.
988			_aSynthesis Collection of Technology_2011
650		7	_2embne _9147823 _aRecuperación de la información
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783031011481
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783031034046
856	4	0	_uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02276-0 _zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid)
942			_2lcc _cLE
998			_b04/2023 _dz _eIG _zSI