000 03779nam a22004695i 4500
999 _c387380
_d387380
001 387380
003 ES-MaUEC
005 20230318200900.0
006 a||||fo|||| 00| 0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 220601s2019 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783031021718
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-031-02171-8
_2doi
040 _aES-MaUEC
_bspa
_cES-MaUEC
_dES-MaUEC
050 4 _aQA76.9.N38
_b2019 EB
100 1 _aSøgaard, Anders,
_eautor
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_9687413
_d1981-
245 1 0 _aCross-Lingual Word Embeddings
_cby Anders Søgaard, Ivan Vulić, Sebastian Ruder, Manaal Faruqui
250 _a1st edition 2019
264 1 _aCham
_bSpringer International Publishing
_c2019
300 _a1 recurso en línea (XI, 120 páginas)
336 _atexto
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _aelectrónico
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _arecurso electrónico
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _aarchivo de texto
_bPDF
490 0 _aSynthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies
_x1947-4059
505 0 _aPreface -- Introduction -- Monolingual Word Embedding Models -- Cross-Lingual Word Embedding Models: Typology -- A Brief History of Cross-Lingual Word Representations -- Word-Level Alignment Models -- Sentence-Level Alignment Methods -- Document-Level Alignment Models -- From Bilingual to Multilingual Training -- Unsupervised Learning of Cross-Lingual Word Embeddings -- Applications and Evaluation -- Useful Data and Software -- General Challenges and Future Directions -- Bibliography -- Authors' Biographies.
520 _aThe majority of natural language processing (NLP) is English language processing, and while there is good language technology support for (standard varieties of) English, support for Albanian, Burmese, or Cebuano--and most other languages--remains limited. Being able to bridge this digital divide is important for scientific and democratic reasons but also represents an enormous growth potential. A key challenge for this to happen is learning to align basic meaning-bearing units of different languages. In this book, the authors survey and discuss recent and historical work on supervised and unsupervised learning of such alignments. Specifically, the book focuses on so-called cross-lingual word embeddings. The survey is intended to be systematic, using consistent notation and putting the available methods on comparable form, making it easy to compare wildly different approaches. In so doing, the authors establish previously unreported relations between these methods and are able to present a fast-growing literature in a very compact way. Furthermore, the authors discuss how best to evaluate cross-lingual word embedding methods and survey the resources available for students and researchers interested in this topic.
988 _aSynthesis Collection of Technology_2019
650 7 _2embne
_9166090
_aAprendizaje automático
650 7 _2embne
_9158738
_aProceso en lenguaje natural (Informática)
650 7 _2embne
_9140153
_aSemántica
700 1 _aVulić, Ivan
_eautor
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_9687415
700 1 _aRuder, Sebastian
_eautor
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_9687414
700 1 _aFaruqui, Manaal
_eautor
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_9687416
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031001826
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031010439
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031032998
856 4 0 _uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02171-8
_zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid)
942 _2lcc
_cLE
998 _b03/2023
_dz
_esc
_zSI