000			03153nam a2200421 i 4500
999			_c374558 _d374558 _x1
001			374558
003			ES-MaUEC
005			20230508163430.0
006			a||||fo|||| 00| 0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			151215s2016 sz a s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783319247595
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-319-24759-5 _2doi
040			_aES-MaUEC _bspa _cES-MaUEC _dES-MaUEC _d
050		4	_aHD6331 _b2016 EB
100	1		_aĎuranová, Lenka _eautor _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245	1	0	_aPersistent Work-related Technology Use, Recovery and Well-being Processes : _bFocus on Supplemental Work After Hours _cby Lenka Ďuranová, Sandra Ohly
250			_aFirst edition 2016
264		1	_aCham _bSpringer International Publishing _c2016
300			_a1 recurso en línea (XIII, 97 páginas) _bilustraciones
336			_2rdacontent _aTexto _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aelectrónico _bc
338			_2rdacarrier _arecurso electrónico _bcr
347			_aarchivo de texto _bPDF
490	0		_aSpringerBriefs in Psychology _x2192-8371
505	0		_aChapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: Theoretical background -- Chapter 3: Conceptualization of core concepts -- Chapter 4: Empirical findings -- Chapter 5: Conceptual framework with the focus on recovery and well-being processes -- Chapter 6: Conclusion and discussion.
520			_aThe aim of this work is to provide insight into the process of employee recovery and well-being in regard to work-related ICT use during after-hours. Therefore, we discuss (1) theories that help us to understand the determinants and outcomes of this behavior, (2) our core concepts recovery and well-being, and (3) previous empirical findings on ICT use after hours for work purposes. On the basis of literature review, we propose a new conceptual overall framework of ICT use after hours for work purposes with the focus on employee recovery and well-being processes. Thereby, we posit ICT use after hours for work purposes as potential stressor, resource, or demand (see action theory by Hacker, 1998, 2003; Frese and Zapf 1994), depending on many personal and environmental factors, but primarily on cognitive appraisals (see transactional model of stress by Lazarus and Folkman 1984). This three-way division enables us to propose various linear and non-linear associations to focused outcomes. We conclude with an overall discussion on further research concerning the identified research gaps.
988			_aSpringer_Psychology_2016
650		7	_2embne _9406596 _aInnovaciones tecnológicas _xGestión
700	1		_aOhly, Sandra _eautor _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut _9683786
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783319247571
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783319247588
856	4	0	_uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24759-5 _zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid)
942			_2lcc _cLE
998			_b05/2022 _dz _ek _zSI