000			03558nam a2200421 i 4500
999			_c374530 _d374530
001			374530
003			ES-MaUEC
005			20230508173500.0
006			a||||fo|||| 00| 0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			160623s2016 xxk| s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9781137474896
024	7		_a10.1057/978-1-137-47489-6 _2doi
040			_aES-MaUEC _bspa _cES-MaUEC _dES-MaUEC _dES-MaUEC
050		4	_aBF81 _b2016 EB
100	1		_aLong, Wahbie _eautor _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut _9683743
245	1	2	_aA History of "Relevance" in Psychology _cby Wahbie Long
250			_aFirst edition 2016
264		1	_aLondon _bSpringer International Publishing _c2016
300			_a1 recurso en línea (XII, 222 páginas) _bilustraciones
336			_2rdacontent _aTexto _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aelectrónico _bc
338			_2rdacarrier _arecurso electrónico _bcr
347			_aarchivo de texto _bPDF
490	0		_aPalgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology
505	0		_aChapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. A History of 'Relevance' -- Chapter 3. Theorizing 'Relevance' -- Chapter 4. Themes in South African Psychology (1948-2011) -- Chapter 5. 'Relevance' and the SAPA-PIRSA Split -- Chapter 6. Science and Society in the Time of SAPA (1948-1961) -- Chapter 7. The Rise and Fall of 'Ethnic-National Relevance (1963-1977) -- Chapter 8. The Quest for 'Social Relevance' (1978-1993) -- Chapter 9. 'Relevance' in the Post-Apartheid Era (1994-2011) -- Chapter 10. Conclusion.
520			_aPalgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology Series Editor: Jack Martin, Burnaby Mouthain Endowed Professor of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Canada This book represents the first attempt to historicise and theorise appeals for 'relevance' in psychology. It argues that the persistence of questions about the 'relevance' of psychology derives from the discipline's terminal inability to define its subject matter, its reliance on a socially disinterested science to underwrite its knowledge claims, and its consequent failure to address itself to the needs of a rapidly changing world. The chapters go on to consider the 'relevance' debate within South African psychology, by critically analysing discourse of forty-five presidential, keynote and opening addresses delivered at annual national psychology congresses between 1950 and 2011, and observes how appeals for 'relevance' were advanced by reactionary, progressive and radical psychologists alike. The book presents, moreover, the provocative thesis that the revolutionary quest for 'social relevance' that began in the 1960s has been supplanted by an ethic of 'market relevance' that threatens to isolate the discipline still further from the anxieties of broader society. With powerful interest groups continuing to co-opt psychologists without relent, this is a development that only psychologists of conscience can arrest.
988			_aSpringer_Psychology_2016
650		7	_2embne _9138046 _aPsicología _xHistoria
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9781137474889
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9781349692835
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9781349692828
856	4	0	_uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47489-6 _zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid)
942			_2lcc _cLE
998			_b05/2022 _dz _ek _zSI