| 000 | 03646nam a22004575i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c347235 _d347235 _x1 |
||
| 001 | 347235 | ||
| 003 | ES-MaUEC | ||
| 005 | 20230102120725.0 | ||
| 006 | a||||fo|||| 00| 0 | ||
| 007 | cr nn nnnaamaa | ||
| 008 | 210521s2021 sz | s |||| 0|eng d | ||
| 020 | _a9783030710408 | ||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1007/978-3-030-71040-8 _2doi |
|
| 040 |
_aES-MaUEC _bspa _cES-MaUEC _dES-MaUEC |
||
| 050 | 4 |
_aQP360.5 _b2021 EB |
|
| 100 | 1 |
_aBenetka, Gerhard _eautor _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut _9680633 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aDiscussing Cognitive Neuroscience : _bPsychology, Neurophysiology, and Philosophy on the Mind, Body and Brain _cby Gerhard Benetka, Hans Werbik |
| 250 | _aFirst edition 2021 | ||
| 264 | 1 |
_aCham _bSpringer International Publishing _c2021 |
|
| 300 |
_a1 recurso en línea (VII, 171 páginas) _b3 ilustraciones |
||
| 336 |
_2rdacontent _aTexto _btxt |
||
| 337 |
_2rdamedia _aelectrónico _bc |
||
| 338 |
_2rdacarrier _arecurso electrónico _bcr |
||
| 347 |
_aarchivo de texto _bPDF |
||
| 490 | 0 |
_aAnnals of Theoretical Psychology ; _v17 |
|
| 490 | 0 | _aBehavioral Science and Psychology (SpringerNature-41168) | |
| 490 | 0 | _aBehavioral Science and Psychology (SpringerNature-43718) | |
| 505 | 0 | _aChapter 1. Critique of neuropsychology - A polemic -- Chapter 2. Living body (Leib) or physical dataset? Antonio Damsio's and Thomas Fuchs's holistic conception of the human being as opposite standpoint to reductionist models -- Chapter 3. The person and the brain -- Chapter 4. The neuropsychological discourse in philosophical critique - Bennett/Hacker and the consequences -- Chapter 5. Persistent biologism and the misuse of neuropsychology - an activity-theoretical contribution -- Chapter 6. Measuring free will with the readiness potential? New data on an old misunderstanding -- Chapter 7. The brain as protagonist - Without the brain all is nothing -- Chapter 8. Is it possible to simulate "thought"? | |
| 520 | 3 | _aThe sciences philosophy, psychology and neuroscience share the basis that all refer to the human being. Therefore, an interdisciplinary collaboration would be desirable. The exchange of criticism is an essential requirement for interdisciplinary collaboration. Criticism must be heard and - if possible - considered. Indeed, criticism can be valid or unwarranted. However, whether criticism is unwarranted can only emerge from discussion and conversation. In the discussion of cognitive neuroscience, some criticism can easily be considered (such as the mereological fallacy that represents that talking about the person is substituted with talking bout the brain). Another issue for an interdisciplinary discussion of cognitive neuroscience is the interpretation of the readiness potential including re-considering Benjamin Libet's classic experiments. Additionally, a critical discussion on cognitive neuroscience must address ethical questions, such as the possibility of the abuse of neuroscientific insight. . | |
| 988 | _aSpringer_Psychology_2021 | ||
| 650 | 7 |
_2embne _9413165 _aNeurociencia cognitiva |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_2embne _9413149 _aPsicología cognitiva |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_2embne _9140561 _aEtnopsicología |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aWerbik, Hans, _d1941- _eautor _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut _9680634 |
|
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrinted edition: _z9783030710392 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrinted edition: _z9783030710415 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrinted edition: _z9783030710422 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71040-8 _zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid) |
| 942 |
_2lcc _cLE |
||
| 998 |
_b01/2022 _dz _esc _zSI |
||