| 000 | 05112nam a22004215i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 650 | 7 |
_aPsicología de la salud _2embne _9535718 |
|
| 999 |
_c120491 _d120491 _x1 |
||
| 001 | 120491 | ||
| 003 | ES-MaUEC | ||
| 005 | 20230102114044.0 | ||
| 006 | a||||fo|||| 00| 0 | ||
| 007 | cr nn nnnaamaa | ||
| 008 | 200613s2020 gw a o |||| 0|eng d | ||
| 020 | _a9783030480554 | ||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1007/978-3-030-48055-4 _2doi |
|
| 040 |
_aES-MaUEC _bspa _cES-MaUEC _dES-MaUEC |
||
| 050 | 4 |
_aR726.7 _b2020 EB |
|
| 100 | 1 |
_aCornish, Peter _eautor _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2014149864 _1http://viaf.org/viaf/311777681 _9674545 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aStepped Care 2.0: A Paradigm Shift in Mental Health _cPeter Cornish |
| 250 | _aFirst edition | ||
| 264 | 1 |
_aCham _bSpringer International Publishing _bImprint: Springer _c2020 |
|
| 300 |
_a1 recurso en línea (XV, 137 páginas) _b24 ilustraciones, 19 ilustraciones a color |
||
| 336 |
_2rdacontent _aTexto _btxt |
||
| 337 |
_2rdamedia _aelectrónico _bc |
||
| 338 |
_2rdacarrier _arecurso electrónico _bcr |
||
| 347 |
_aArchivo de texto _bPDF |
||
| 490 | 0 | _aBehavioral Science and Psychology (Springer-41168) | |
| 505 | 0 | _aChapter 1. We Need a Better System -- Chapter 2. Open Access -- Chapter 3. Recovery Values and Principles -- Chapter 4. Expanding the Options Through Nine Steps -- Chapter 5. Navigating the System -- Chapter 6. Collaboration & Co-Design -- Chapter 7. Adapting for Unique Settings -- Chapter 8. Towards a Paradigm Shift. | |
| 520 | 3 | _aThis book is a primer on Stepped Care 2.0. It is the first book in a series of three. This primer addresses the increased demand for mental health care by supporting stakeholders (help-seekers, providers, and policy-makers) to collaborate in enhancing care outcomes through work that is both more meaningful and sustainable. Our current mental health system is organized to offer highly intensive psychiatric and psychological care. While undoubtedly effective, demand far exceeds the supply for such specialized programming. Many people seeking to improve their mental health do not need psychiatric medication or sophisticated psychotherapy. A typical help seeker needs basic support. For knee pain, a nurse or physician might first recommend icing and resting the knee, working to achieve a healthy weight, and introducing low impact exercise before considering specialist care. Unfortunately, there is no parallel continuum of care for mental health and wellness. As a result, a person seeking the most basic support must line up and wait for the specialist along with those who may have very severe and/or complex needs. Why are there no lower intensity options? One reason is fear and stigma. A thorough assessment by a specialist is considered best practice. After all, what if we miss signs of suicide or potential harm to others? A reasonable question on the surface; however, the premise is flawed. First, the risk of suicide, or threat to others, for those already seeking care, is low. Second, our technical capacity to predict on these threats is virtually nil. Finally, assessment in our current culture of fear tends to focus more on the identification of deficits (as opposed to functional capacities), leading to over-prescription of expensive remedies and lost opportunities for autonomy and self-management. Despite little evidence linking assessment to treatment outcomes, and no evidence supporting our capacity to detect risk for harm, we persist with lengthy intake assessments and automatic specialist referrals that delay care. Before providers and policy makers can feel comfortable letting go of risk assessment, however, they need to understand the forces underlying the risk paradigm that dominates our society and restricts creative solutions for supporting those in need. SC2.0 reimagines the original UK stepped care model by integrating a range of traditional and emerging online mental health programs systematically within the context of recovery principles and practice. SC2.0 prevents problems from escalating into serious conditions by systematizing shared responsibility for accessing care options at the right time, with the right people, in the right context. Program matching decisions in SC2.0 are also more flexible and client-centric: Rather than stepping only according to diagnosis or symptom severity, one or more options of varying intensity can be jointly selected based on client need, preference, functioning, and readiness for engaging in healing work. . | |
| 988 | _aSpringer_Psychology_2020 | ||
| 710 | 2 |
_aSpringerLink (Online service) _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2005046756 _1http://viaf.org/viaf/148105729 |
|
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrinted edition: _z9783030480547 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrinted edition: _z9783030480561 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrinted edition: _z9783030480578 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48055-4 _zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid) |
| 942 |
_2lcc _cLE |
||
| 998 |
_b06/2020 _dz _eo _zSI |
||