000			03503nam a22004335i 4500
999			_c120481 _d120481 _x1
001			120481
003			ES-MaUEC
005			20230102114044.0
006			a||||fo|||| 00| 0
007			cr nn nnnaamaa
008			200602s2020 gw a o |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783030451431
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-030-45143-1 _2doi
040			_aES-MaUEC _bspa _cES-MaUEC _dES-MaUEC
050		4	_aB835 _b2020 EB
100	1		_aMaree, David J. F. _eautor _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut _9674521
245	1	0	_aRealism and Psychological Science _cDavid J. F. Maree
250			_aFirst edition
264		1	_aCham _bSpringer International Publishing _bImprint: Springer _c2020
300			_a1 recurso en línea (VIII, 151 páginas) _b3 ilustraciones
336			_2rdacontent _aTexto _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aelectrónico _bc
338			_2rdacarrier _arecurso electrónico _bcr
347			_aArchivo de texto _bPDF
490	0		_aBehavioral Science and Psychology (Springer-41168)
505	0		_a1.Introduction -- 2.The Methodological Division: Quantitative and Qualitative Methods -- 3.The Applicative Split: The Science-Practitioner Model of Training and Practice -- 4.The Metatheoretical Opposition: Positivism and Constructionism -- 5.Realism in Psychological Science -- 6.The Realist Image of Science.
520	3		_aThe book provides an argument why realism is a viable metatheoretical framework for psychological science. By looking at some variations of realism such as scientific realism, critical realism, situational realism and Ferraris' new realism, a realist view of science is outlined that can feature as a metatheory for psychological science. Realism is a necessary correction for the mythical image of science responsible for and maintained by a number of dichotomies and polarities in psychology. Thus, the quantitative-qualitative dichotomy, scientist-practitioner polarity and positivist-constructionist opposition feed off and maintains a mythic image of science on levels of practice, methods and metatheory. Realism makes a clear distinction between ontology and epistemic access to reality, the latter which easily fits with softer versions of constructionism, and the former which grounds science in resistance and possibility, loosely translated as criticism. By taking science as a critical activity an issue such as the quantitative imperative looses its defining force as a hallmark of science - it provides epistemic access to certain parts of reality. In addition, essentially critical activities characteristic of various qualitative approaches may be welcomed as proper science. Academics, professionals and researchers in psychology would find value in situating their scholarly work in a realist metatheory avoiding the pitfalls of traditional methodologies and theories.
988			_aSpringer_Psychology_2020
650		7	_aRealismo _2embne _9138281
650		7	_aPsicología _2embne _9174329 _xFilosofía
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service) _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2005046756 _1http://viaf.org/viaf/148105729
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783030451424
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783030451448
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783030451455
856	4	0	_uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45143-1 _zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid)
942			_2lcc _cLE
998			_b06/2020 _dz _eo _zSI