000			03208nam a22004335i 4500
999			_c120069 _d120069 _x1
001			120069
003			ES-MaUEC
005			20230102114023.0
006			a||||fo|||| 00| 0
007			cr nn nnnaamaa
008			191105s2019 gw | o |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783030314491
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-030-31449-1 _2doi
040			_aES-MaUEC _bspa _cES-MaUEC _dES-MaUEC
050		4	_aBF41 _b2019 EB
100	1		_aToomela, Aaro _eautor _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut _9674268
245	1	4	_aThe Psychology of Scientific Inquiry / _cAaro Toomela.
250			_aFirst edition 2019
264		1	_aCham _bSpringer International Publishing : _bImprint: Springer _c2019
300			_a recurso en línea (XV, 132 páginas)
336			_2rdacontent _aTexto _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aelectrónico _bc
338			_2rdacarrier _arecurso electrónico _bcr
347			_atext file _bPDF
490	0		_aSpringerBriefs in Theoretical Advances in Psychology _x2511-395X
505	0		_aChapter1: The problem. Psychology: A science yet to become science -- Chapter2: Science is based on certain assumptions -- Chapter3: Doubts, assumptions, and social sciences and psychology today -- Chapter4: Causality, understanding and explanation: Philosophical roots -- Chapter5: Causality, understanding and explanation: Fundamentally limited views -- Chapter6: Causality, understanding and explanation: Back to the roots -- Chapter7: Theory of causality and modern mainstream psychology -- Chapter8: What next? Back to the future.
520	3		_aThis brief sets out on a course to distinguish three main kinds of thought that underlie scientific thinking. Current science has not agreed on an understanding of what exactly the aim of science actually is, how to understand scientific knowledge, and how such knowledge can be achieved. Furthermore, no science today also explicitly admits the fact that knowledge can be constructed in different ways and therefore every scientist should be able to recognize the form of thought that under-girds their understanding of scientific theory. In response to this, this texts seeks to answer the questions: What is science? What is (scientific) explanation? What is causality and why it matters? Science is a way to find new knowledge. The way we think about the world constrains the aspects of it we can understand. Scientists, the author suggests, should engage in a metacognitive perspective on scientific theory that reflects not only what exists in the world, but also the way the scientist thinks about the world.
988			_aSpringer_Psychology_2019
650		7	_aPsicología fenomenológica _2embne _9674270
650		7	_aPsicología _xFilosofía _2embne _9174329
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783030314484
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783030314507
856	4	0	_uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31449-1 _zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid)
942			_2lcc _cLE
998			_b06/2020 _dz _eo _zSI