000 03130nam a22004095i 4500
999 _c119807
_d119807
_x1
001 119807
003 ES-MaUEC
005 20230102114009.0
006 a||||fo|||| 00| 0
007 cr nn nnnaamaa
008 180307s2018 gw | o |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783319735948
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-319-73594-8
_2doi
040 _aES-MaUEC
_bspa
_cES-MaUEC
_dES-MaUEC
050 4 _aRA1148
_b2018 EB
100 1 _aWolffram, Heather
_eautor
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2010025611
_1http://viaf.org/viaf/107429786
_9673873
245 1 0 _aForensic Psychology in Germany :
_bWitnessing Crime, 1880-1939 /
_cHeather Wolffram.
250 _aFirst edition 2018
264 1 _aCham
_bSpringer International Publishing
_c2018
300 _a1 recurso en línea (VII, 257 páginas)
336 _2rdacontent
_aTexto
_btxt
337 _2rdamedia
_aelectrónico
_bc
338 _2rdacarrier
_arecurso electrónico
_bcr
347 _atext file
_bPDF
490 0 _aBehavioral Science and Psychology (Springer-41168)
505 0 _a1. Introduction: Witnessing Crime -- 2. The Birth Of Forensic Psychology - The Berchtold Trial -- 3. Establishing the Psychology of Testimony -- 4. Forensic Psychology Beyond the Witness -- 5. Expertise Contested -- 6. Forensic Psychology in the Courtroom - The Frenzel Trial -- 7. Forensic Psychology under the Swastika -- 8. Conclusion: Forensic Psychology on the Eve of the War.
520 _aThis book examines the emergence and early development of forensic psychology in Germany from the late nineteenth century until the outbreak of the Second World War, highlighting the field's interdisciplinary beginnings and contested evolution. Initially envisaged as a psychology of all those involved in criminal proceedings, this new discipline promised to move away from an exclusive focus on the criminal to provide a holistic view of how human fallibility impacted upon criminal justice. As this book argues, however, by the inter-war period, forensic psychology had largely become a psychology of the witness; its focus narrowed by the exigencies of the courtroom. Utilising detailed studies of the 1896 Berchtold trial and the 1930 Frenzel trial, the book asks whether the tensions between psychiatry, psychology, forensic medicine, pedagogy and law over psychological expertise were present in courtroom practice and considers why a clear winner in the "battle for forensic psychology" had yet to emerge by 1939. .
988 _aSpringer_Psychology_2018
650 7 _aPsicología legal
_zAlemania
_2embne
_9148368
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
_0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2005046756
_1http://viaf.org/viaf/148105729
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783319735931
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783319735955
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783030088187
856 4 0 _uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73594-8
_zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid)
942 _2lcc
_cLE
998 _b05/2020
_dz
_eo
_zSI