000			03812nam a22004095i 4500
999			_c119806 _d119806 _x1
001			119806
003			ES-MaUEC
005			20230102114009.0
006			a||||fo|||| 00| 0
007			cr nn nnnaamaa
008			180305s2018 gw | o |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783319743011
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-319-74301-1 _2doi
040			_aES-MaUEC _bspa _cES-MaUEC _dES-MaUEC
050		4	_aBF199 _b2018 EB
100	1		_aCarrara, Kester _eautor _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2003127553 _1http://viaf.org/viaf/29233712 _9673872
245	1	0	_aRadical Behaviorism and Cultural Analysis / _cKester Carrara.
250			_aFirst edition 2018
264		1	_aCham _bSpringer International Publishing _c2018
300			_a1 recurso en línea (XIX, 104 páginas)
336			_2rdacontent _aTexto _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aelectrónico _bc
338			_2rdacarrier _arecurso electrónico _bcr
347			_atext file _bPDF
490	0		_aBehavioral Science and Psychology (Springer-41168)
505	1		_aChapter 1 - Psychology and dichotomic thinking -- Chapter 2 - The unfeasibility of the "thing-in-itself" as an explanatory source for behavior -- Chapter 3 - Nothing can "be", other than through its relations -- Chapter 4 - Sustainability and conditional altruism -- Chapter 5 - Cultural designs and descendants: What does the future hold for Pedro, Isabela, and Miguel?.
520			_aThis book shows how the three-term contingency paradigm created by B.F. Skinner can be applied to describe and explain cultural practices phenomena produced by complex relations between behavior and environment. It updates the academic debate on the best paradigm to analyze complex social interactions (contingency or metacontingency), arguing that Skinner's three-term contingency - the conceptual tool created to analyze human behavior by decomposing it in three parts: discriminative stimulus, operant response and reinforcement/punishment - is the best unit of analysis since what is selected in social interactions are not the actions of the group but of individuals gathered in a group situation to form an articulated and interlocked behavioral practice. The author argues in favor of a relational approach to study behavior and identifies its theoretical foundations in the philosophy of Ernst Mach, especially in Mach's concept of functional relations and its influence on Skinner. Departing from this theoretical framework, the author argues that behavior can only be studied through the analysis of how it emerges from relations, and cannot be explained by hypothetical constructs such as cognitive maps, personality formation mechanisms, drives, traits and preconceived motivational forces. Radical Behaviorism and Cultural Analysis will be of interest to psychology researchers and students interested in the theoretical foundations of behavior analysis, as well as to social scientists and policy makers from other areas interested in how behavior analysis can be used to study complex social interactions and how it can be applied to build a more fair and sustainable society through cultural planning and the development of prosocial behavior. .
988			_aSpringer_Psychology_2018
650		7	_aConductismo _2embne _9139808
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service) _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2005046756 _1http://viaf.org/viaf/148105729
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783319743004
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783319743028
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783030089597
856	4	0	_uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74301-1 _zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid)
942			_2lcc _cLE
998			_b05/2020 _dz _eo _zSI