000			04152nam a22004695i 4500
999			_c119686 _d119686 _x1
001			119686
003			ES-MaUEC
005			20230102114002.0
006			a||||fo|||| 00| 0
007			cr nn nnnaamaa
008			180425s2018 gw | o |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783319781600
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-319-78160-0 _2doi
040			_aES-MaUEC _bspa _cES-MaUEC _dES-MaUEC
050		4	_aQ225 _b2018 EB
100	1		_aPytlikZillig, Lisa M. _eautor _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut _9673715
245	1	0	_aDeliberative Public Engagement with Science _bAn Empirical Investigation _cby Lisa M. PytlikZillig, Myiah J. Hutchens, Peter Muhlberger, Frank J. Gonzalez, Alan J. Tomkins.
250			_aFirst edition 2018
264		1	_aCham _bSpringer International Publishing _c2018
300			_a1 recurso en línea (XI, 129 páginas) _b12 ilustraciones, 4 ilustraciones a color
336			_2rdacontent _aTexto _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aelectrónico _bc
338			_2rdacarrier _arecurso electrónico _bcr
347			_atext file _bPDF
490	0		_aSpringerBriefs in Psychology _x2192-8363
490	0		_aBehavioral Science and Psychology (Springer-41168)
505	0		_aChapter 1: The Big Picture -- Chapter 2: Specific Methods -- Chapter 3: Knowledge -- Chapter 4: Attitude Change and Polarization -- Chapter 5: Policy Acceptance -- Chapter 6: Conclusion and Future Directions.
506	0		_aOpen Access
520			_aThis compact open access reference delves beyond popular concepts of educated consumers and an informed public by examining the science behind deliberative engagement. Using data from four longitudinal studies, the authors assess public engagement methods in deliberative discussions of ethical, legal, and social issues concerning innovations in nanotechnology. Coverage includes the theoretical origins of the studies, forms of engagement and variations used, and in-depth details on cognitive, affective, and social components that go into the critical thinking process and forming of opinions. Not only are the findings intriguing in and of themselves, but researchers from varied fields will also find them useful in pursuing their own projects. Featured in the coverage: Experimental methods and measures used in relation to specific outcomes. Forms of deliberative engagement affecting objective and subjective knowledge. Effects of engagement variables on attitude formation, change, and polarization. Tracing the processes leading to policy acceptance and support. Study conclusions and evaluation. Plus supplemental materials giving readers access to full study data. Since public engagement methods are widely regarded as valuable for policy input, planning purposes, and understanding societal processes, Deliberative Engagement with Science stands to have a wide audience among psychologists, researchers, academics, and policymakers, as well as professionals in the corporate sphere and the tech industries.
988			_aSpringer_Psychology_2018
650		7	_2embne _aInformación científica y técnica _9158456
700	1		_aHutchens, Myiah J. _eautor _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut _1http://viaf.org/viaf/7153361367737392919 _9673716
700	1		_aMuhlberger, Peter _eautor _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2018101281 _1http://viaf.org/viaf/10153361355837392879 _9673717
700	1		_aGonzalez, Frank J. _eautor _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut _1http://viaf.org/viaf/7153361261637390194 _9673718
700	1		_aTomkins, Alan J. _eautor _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut _1http://viaf.org/viaf/124149196499374791841 _9673719
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service) _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2005046756 _1http://viaf.org/viaf/148105729
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783319781594
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783319781617
856	4	0	_uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78160-0 _zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid)
942			_2lcc _cLE
998			_b05/2020 _dz _eIG _zSI