| 000 | 02978nam a22003855i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c103571 _d103571 _x1 |
||
| 001 | 103571 | ||
| 003 | DE-He213 | ||
| 005 | 20230102113136.0 | ||
| 006 | a||||fo|||| 00| 0 | ||
| 007 | cr nn 008mamaa | ||
| 008 | 140905s2015 gw | s |||| 0|eng d | ||
| 020 | _a9783319091594 | ||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1007/978-3-319-09159-4 _2doi |
|
| 040 |
_bspa _dES-MaUEC |
||
| 050 | 4 |
_aBC177 _b.H487 2015 EB |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aHeuristic Reasoning _cedited by Emiliano Ippoliti. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aCham _bSpringer International Publishing _c2015 |
|
| 300 | _a1 recurso en línea (V, 191 páginas 11 ilustraciones, 1 ilustraciones a color.) | ||
| 336 |
_2rdacontent _aTexto (visual) _btxt |
||
| 337 |
_2rdamedia _aelectrónico _bc |
||
| 338 |
_2rdacarrier _arecurso electrónico _bcr |
||
| 490 | 0 |
_aStudies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, _x2192-6255 ; _v16 |
|
| 490 | 0 | _aEngineering (Springer-11647) | |
| 505 | 0 | _aReasoning at the frontier of knowledge: Introductory essay -- Why should the logic of discovery be revived? A reappraisal -- Are Heuristics Knowledge-Enhancing?Abduction, Models, and Fictions in Science -- Heuristic Appraisal at the Frontier of Research -- Why do Scientific Revolutions begin? -- Withstanding Tensions: Scientific Disagreement and Epistemic Tolerance -- Heuristics as Methods: Validity, Reliability and Velocity -- Dynamic generation of hypotheses: Mandelbrot, Soros and Far-From-Equilibrium. | |
| 520 | 3 | _aHow can we advance knowledge? Which methods do we need in order to make new discoveries? How can we rationally evaluate, reconstruct and offer discoveries as a means of improving the 'method' of discovery itself? And how can we use findings about scientific discovery to boost funding policies, thus fostering a deeper impact of scientific discovery itself? The respective chapters in this book provide readers with answers to these questions. They focus on a set of issues that are essential to the development of types of reasoning for advancing knowledge, such as models for both revolutionary findings and paradigm shifts; ways of rationally addressing scientific disagreement, e.g. when a revolutionary discovery sparks considerable disagreement inside the scientific community; frameworks for both discovery and inference methods; and heuristics for economics and the social sciences. | |
| 988 | _aEBSPRINGER_2018 | ||
| 650 | 7 |
_9139573 _aLógica |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aIppoliti, Emiliano. _eeditor literario _4edt _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2011153053 _1http://viaf.org/viaf/186971988/ |
|
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iEdición impresa: _z9783319091600 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iEdición impresa: _z9783319091587 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iEdición impresa: _z9783319362229 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09159-4 _zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid) |
| 942 |
_2lcc _cLE |
||
| 998 |
_b03/2019 _dz _eIG _zSI |
||