Conceptual foundations of antitrust / Oliver Black
By: Black, Oliver, autor
Material type: 
E-bookPublisher: London : Cambridge University Press, 2009Description: 1 recurso en línea.ISBN: 9780511494666.Subject: Derecho de la competencia -- Reino UnidosOnline resources: Acceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Madrid)
Abstract: Antitrust opposes restrictions on competition, but would be unworkable if it prohibited every such restriction. Principles are therefore needed to determine the categories of restriction that should be prohibited. In the United States such principles are embodied in the doctrine of per se rules and rules of reason. There is a long-standing debate whether Article 81(1) EC does, or should, be subject to a rule of reason of the kind used by the US courts in applying section 1 of the Sherman Act 1890. In US antitrust itself there is an even older debate as to the appropriate scope of rules of reason and per se rules in the application of section 1. One reason why these debates are unresolved is that the parties lack a shared understanding of the nature of, and relations between, per se rules and rules of reason. The modest purpose of this chapter is to clarify the concepts of the two kinds of rule and to identify, at a fairly abstract level, the relations between them. I shall not be offering substantive proposals as to the kinds of conduct suitable for treatment under one or other type of rule.
| Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIBRO-E NO PRÉSTAMO
|
Madrid Digital Acceso Electrónico (UEM) | Ciencias Sociales | KD2218 2009 EB (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Acceso electrónico | eBOOK120166 |
Browsing Madrid Digital shelves, Shelving location: Acceso Electrónico (UEM) Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | |||||||
| KD1641.A65 2006 EB Contractual Correspondence for Architects and Project Managers | KD1715 .N45 2008 EB Capital markets law and compliance : the implications of MiFID | KD1957 .C65 2019 EB La protección de datos en el Reino Unido : evolución del right to privacy y escenarios post-Brexit | KD2218 2009 EB Conceptual foundations of antitrust | KD2965 .G95 2018 EB Medicolegal Issues in Obstetrics and Gynaecology | KD3006.A2 ES International journal of law and management. | KD8473.A13 ES Youth Justice: The Journal of the National Association for Youth Justice |
Antitrust opposes restrictions on competition, but would be unworkable if it prohibited every such restriction. Principles are therefore needed to determine the categories of restriction that should be prohibited. In the United States such principles are embodied in the doctrine of per se rules and rules of reason. There is a long-standing debate whether Article 81(1) EC does, or should, be subject to a rule of reason of the kind used by the US courts in applying section 1 of the Sherman Act 1890. In US antitrust itself there is an even older debate as to the appropriate scope of rules of reason and per se rules in the application of section 1. One reason why these debates are unresolved is that the parties lack a shared understanding of the nature of, and relations between, per se rules and rules of reason. The modest purpose of this chapter is to clarify the concepts of the two kinds of rule and to identify, at a fairly abstract level, the relations between them. I shall not be offering substantive proposals as to the kinds of conduct suitable for treatment under one or other type of rule.
There are no comments on this title.